![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.smalljoys.me\/2025\/11\/10258606_passenger-woman-flying-plane-girl-115604276_1763538675.jpg\")
<\/div>\n<\/figure>\nThe airline continues to argue that a window seat means a seat next to a wall and not necessarily a seat with a view.<\/p>\n
\u2018The use of the word window in reference to a certain seat cannot reasonably be interpreted as a promise that this seat would have exterior views of the window\u2019- the lawyers of the airline mentioned in a motion to dismiss the case on November 10.<\/p>\n
\u2018Rather, the term window identifies the position of the seat, which is next to the wall of the main body of the plane,\u2019- it continued.<\/p>\n The lawyers also mentioned how the plane\u2019s contract of carriage does not explicitly guarantee that the window seat would have an exterior view next to it.<\/p>\n One plaintiff in the case against United mentioned how she went on to pay a massive $170 for the window seat. After boarding, she was shocked to see just a view of the cabin wall, making her upset.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" If you happen to be a fan of window seats while flying to your destination, then you might want to read on further. In reply to a class-action lawsuit filed against Delta Airlines and United Airlines, which was filed by passengers who claimed to have paid extra to sit in window seats but were surprised…<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.smalljoys.me\/2025\/11\/10258606_2015-file-photo-united-airlines-28354127_1763538677.jpg\")
<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n