The Republican Party’s Anti-Intellectual Tradition
The GOP’s distrust of expertise predates Trump, rooted in decades of anti-intellectual rhetoric. Historian Richard Hofstadter traced this back to the mid-20th century, when Republicans used elitism as a political weapon—mocking figures like Adlai Stevenson and questioning liberal intellectual authority. Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon further fueled skepticism, with Nixon promoting conservative think tanks as alternatives to mainstream academia.
This tension escalated under George W. Bush, who downplayed scientific consensus on climate change, stem cell research, and tax policy. His administration limited scientific input, dismissed expert opinions, and censored inconvenient research—especially around global warming and the Iraq War.
Trump amplified this trend, promoting “alternative facts,” undermining pandemic and climate experts, and slashing funding for institutions like the NIH and NOAA. His “commonsense” approach positioned expertise as elitism, a stance that resonated with many voters due to the GOP’s long-standing narrative.
Bush’s Global Democracy Push
Despite his domestic record, George W. Bush championed democracy abroad, arguing that freedom overseas secures liberty at home. He emphasized supporting local reformers over imposing U.S. values, warning that retreating from global leadership empowers authoritarian regimes like China, Russia, and Iran.
Bush contended that even modest U.S. support for democratic movements yields strong results—strengthening American security, reducing migration pressures, and countering hostile influence. Investing in global democracy, he argued, is not charity but strategic policy: a cost-effective way to ensure peace, prosperity, and stability at home and abroad.